Publicación: Datos abiertos como herramienta de transparencia y participación ciudadana : diagnóstico de la política guatemalteca, retos y recomendaciones (2018 – 2025)
| dc.contributor.author | Marroquín Pellecer, Luis Manuel | |
| dc.contributor.educationalvalidator | Zamora, Ramón | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-04-23T21:30:14Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | |
| dc.description | Formato PDF digital — 110 páginas — incluye gráficos, tablas y referencias bibliográficas. | |
| dc.description.abstract | La presente investigación analiza los principales retos que enfrenta la implementación de la Política Nacional de Datos Abiertos en Guatemala durante el período 2018 – 2025, con énfasis en los obstáculos institucionales, técnicos y de gobernanza que han limitado su efectividad como herramienta de transparencia, participación ciudadana y generación de valor público. El estudio adopta un enfoque cualitativo de carácter descriptivo – analítico, basado en entrevistas semiestructuradas a funcionarios públicos y expertos, así como en el análisis documental de marcos normativos, compromisos internacionales y reportes especializados. A partir de la triangulación de fuentes testimoniales, documentales e índices internacionales, se identifican brechas significativas entre la publicación formal de información y la apertura efectiva de datos reutilizables, así como limitaciones en capacidades técnicas, coordinación interinstitucional y uso ciudadano. Finalmente, se formulan recomendaciones orientadas a fortalecer la calidad, gobernanza y sostenibilidad de los datos abiertos, así como su alineación con estándares internacionales y su aprovechamiento para la innovación cívica y la gestión pública. | spa |
| dc.description.abstract | This research examines the main challenges affecting the implementation of the National Open Data Policy in Guatemala during the period 2018 –2025, with particular attention to institutional, technical, and governance constraints that have limited its effectiveness as a tool for transparency, citizen participation, and public value creation. The study adopts a qualitative descriptive –analytical approach, drawing on semistructured interviews with public officials and experts, as well as documentary analysis of regulatory frameworks, international commitments, and specialized reports. Through the triangulation of testimonial, documentary, and international index data, the analysis identifies significant gaps between the formal publication of information and th e effective availability of reusable open datasets, alongside persistent limitations in technical capacity, inter-institutional coordination, and civic use. In addition, international case studies and a prospective interoperability scenario are examined to contextualize potential pathways for improvement in Guatemala. The study concludes with a set of recommendations aimed at strengthening data quality, institutional governance, and sustainability, while promoting alignment with global standards and the use of open data for civic innovation and public sect or improvement. | eng |
| dc.description.degreelevel | Pregrado | |
| dc.description.degreename | Licenciado en Relaciones Internacionales | |
| dc.format.extent | 110 p. | |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorio.uvg.edu.gt/handle/123456789/6385 | |
| dc.language.iso | spa | |
| dc.publisher | Universidad del Valle de Guatemala | |
| dc.publisher.branch | Campus Central | |
| dc.publisher.faculty | Facultad de Ciencias Sociales | |
| dc.publisher.place | Guatemala | |
| dc.publisher.program | Licenciatura en Relaciones Internacionales | |
| dc.relation.references | Acción Ciudadana. (2024). Acción Ciudadana presenta el informe anual de transparencia activa de las instituciones públicas. https://accion - ciudadana.org/2024/05/25/accion - ciudadana - presenta - el - informe - anual - de - transparencia - activa - de - las - instituciones - publicas/ | |
| dc.relation.references | API Catalogue. (s.f.). API Catalogue . https://www.api.gov.uk/ | |
| dc.relation.references | Associated Press. (8 de 10 de 2024). Guatemala is stuck with a problematic attorney general, a legal study says . https://apnews.com/article/guatemala - attorney - general - porras - legal - analysis - b5066b2701cdef08874392bfbead9a30 | |
| dc.relation.references | Axelrod, R., & Keohane, R. (1985). Achieving cooperation under anarchy: Strategies and instituions. World politics, 38 (1), 226 - 254. https://doi.org/https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/world - politics/article/abs/achieving - cooperation - under - anarchy - strategies - and - institutions/706B24B2FB4525D661BEB5E954D6DC49 | |
| dc.relation.references | Banco Mundial. (s.f. a.). Data Use and Literacy Program: overview . https://www.worldbank.org/en/programs/data - use - and - literacy - program/overview | |
| dc.relation.references | Banco Mundial. (s.f. b.). Individuos que utilizan el Internet (% de la población) - Guatemala (IT.NET.USER.ZS) . https://datos.bancomundial.org/indicador/IT.NET.USER.ZS?locations=GT | |
| dc.relation.references | Banco Mundial. (s.f. c.). Open Data Toolkit: Technical assitance and funding . https://opendatatoolkit.worldbank.org/en/data/opendatatoolkit/technical - assistance | |
| dc.relation.references | Bates, J. (2013). The Domestication of Open Government Data Advocacy in the UK: A Neo - Gramsican Analysis. Policy and Internet, 5 (1), 118 - 137. https://doi.org/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/poi3.25 | |
| dc.relation.references | Bates, J. (2019). Data politics: Worlds, subjects, rights. En S. Milan, M. Guitérrez, & Treré, Big Data from the South. Amsterdam University Press. | |
| dc.relation.references | Bermeo, N. (2016). On Democratic Backsliding. Journal of Democracy, 27 (1), 5 - 19. https://doi.org/https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/on - democratic - backsliding/ | |
| dc.relation.references | Biermann, F., Kanie, N., & Kim, R. (2017). Global governance by goal - setting: the novel approach of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26 - 27 , 26 - 31. https://doi.org/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343517300209?via%3Dihu b | |
| dc.relation.references | Bigo, D., Isin, E., & Ruppert, E. (2019). Data Politics, worlds, subjects, rights. Routledge. https://doi.org/https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/24517/1/9781315167305.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework. European Law Journal, 13 (4), 447 - 468. https://doi.org/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468 - 0386.2007.00378.x | |
| dc.relation.references | Bowen, G. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9 (2), 27 - 40. https://doi.org/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240807798_Document_Analysis_as_a_Q ualitative_Research_Method | |
| dc.relation.references | Bruce, R., & Oneal, J. (2001). Triangulatin Peace. W.W. Norton. | |
| dc.relation.references | CAF. (2021). Datos abiertos para el desarrollo . https://banco - de - desarrollo - de - america - latina.another.co/ | |
| dc.relation.references | Centre for Law and Democracy. (2022). Propuesta de reformas regresivas a la Ley de Acceso a la Información Pública de El Salvador . https://law - democracy.org | |
| dc.relation.references | Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. (2021). La CIDH condena la destitución de magistradas y magistrados de la Sala de lo Constitucional de la Suprema Corte de Justicia, sin respeto a las debidas garantías e insta a El Salvador a preservar al Estado de derecho . https://www.oas.org/es/cidh/jsForm/?File=/es/cidh/prensa/comunicados/2021/110.asp | |
| dc.relation.references | Comisión Presidencial de Gobierno Abierto y Electrónico. (2023). 6to. Plan de Acción Nacional de Gobierno Abierto 2023 - 2025. Gobierno de Guatemala. https://portal.sesan.gob.gt/wp - content/uploads/2024/01/6o - Plan - de - Accion - Nacional.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Comisión Presidencial de Gobierno Abierto y Electrónico. (2024). Informe de resultados de la Comisión Presidencial de Gobierno Abierto y Electrónico Periodo 2024 - 2025. Gobierno de Guatemala. https://gae.gob.gt/wp - content/uploads/2025/10/Informe - de - resultados - de - la - Comision - Presidencial - de - Gobierno - Abierto - y - Electronico - 2024 - 2025.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Congreso de la República de Guatemala. (1997). Ley del Organismo Ejecutivo (Decreto No. 114 - 97). | |
| dc.relation.references | Consejo Nacional de Desarrollo Urbano y Rural. (2014). Plan Nacional de Desarrollo K´atun: nuestra Guatemala 2032. Conadur/Segeplan. | |
| dc.relation.references | Consejo para la Transparencia. (2021). Estudio Nacional de Transparencia 2020. Datavoz. https://www.consejotransparencia.cl/wp - content/uploads/2026/03/Estudio - Nacional - de - Transparencia - 2020.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design (4th ed.). SAGE. | |
| dc.relation.references | Davies, T. S., & Perini, F. (2019). The State of Open Data: Histories and Horizons . African Minds. | |
| dc.relation.references | Dedoose. (2025). Dedoose qualitative analysis . https://www.dedoose.com/ | |
| dc.relation.references | Denzin, N. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6 (2), 80 - 88. https://doi.org/https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2012 - 14900 - 002 | |
| dc.relation.references | Doyle, M. W. (1986). Liberalism and World Politics. The American Political Science Review, 80 (4), 1151 - 1169. https://doi.org/https://is.muni.cz/el/1423/podzim2009/MVZ200/Doyle__Liberalism___World_Poli tics__APSR__1986.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Dunne, T. (2010). Liberalism. En S. Baylis, & S. O. Smith, The globalization of world politics (págs. 108 - 123). Oxford University Press. | |
| dc.relation.references | Dye, T. R. (2013). Understanding public policy (14 th. ed.). Pearson. | |
| dc.relation.references | El País. (2026). Sección internacional. El Pais . https://elpais.com/america/ | |
| dc.relation.references | El Salvador Now. (24 de 9 de 2024). Nine state agencies conceal their index of classified information . https://www.elsalvadornow.org | |
| dc.relation.references | Fonseca López, M. (2021). José Luis Méndez, Políticas públicas: Enfoque estratégico para América Latina, Ciudad de México, Fondo de Cultura Económica, 364 pp. Gest. polít. pública , 30 (2), 187 - 191. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29265/gypp.v30i2.911 | |
| dc.relation.references | Fox, J. (2007). The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability. Development in Practice, 17 (4 - 5), 663 - 671. https://doi.org/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09614520701469955 | |
| dc.relation.references | Freedom House. (2025). Freedom in the world 2025: El Salvador . https://freedomhouse.org | |
| dc.relation.references | Fung, A. (2015). Putting the Public Back into Governance: The Challenges of Citizen Participation and Its Future. Public Administration Review, 75 (4), 513 - 522. https://doi.org/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/puar.12361 | |
| dc.relation.references | Gobierno de Chile. (2008). Ley 20285 sobre acceso a la información pública . https://www.bcn.cl/leychile/navegar?idNorma=276363 | |
| dc.relation.references | Gobierno de Guatemala. (2016). Estrategia de Gobierno Abierto . https://portal.segeplan.gob.gt/segeplan/?page_id=6206 | |
| dc.relation.references | Gobierno de Guatemala. (2018). Política Nacional de Datos Abiertos . https://www.mineco.gob.gt/images/datos_abiertos/acuerdos/FINAL%20Politica%20Nacional%20 de%20Datos%20Abiertosvf%20 - %20GAE.pdf. | |
| dc.relation.references | Gobierno de México. (2015). Ley General de Transparencia y Acceso a la Información Pública. https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/431940/25_linai.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Gobierno de México/INAI. (2023). Informe Anual 2023. https://www.centrogeo.org.mx/archivo/archivo - transparencia/transparencia - relevante/3818 - informe - anual - 2023 - cumplimiento - lftaip - lgtaip/file | |
| dc.relation.references | Government Digital Service. (9 de 2 de 2017). Policy paper. Government Transformation Strategy: role of the Government Digital Service . https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/government - transformation - strategy - 2017 - to - 2020/government - transformation - strategy - role - of - the - government - digital - service | |
| dc.relation.references | Guest, G., Namey, E., & Mitchell, M. (2013). Collecting qualitative data. SAGE. | |
| dc.relation.references | Gurstein, M. (2011). Open data: Empowering the empowered or effective data use for everyone? First Monday, 16 (2 - 7). https://doi.org/https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3316 | |
| dc.relation.references | Haas, P. (1992). Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination. Internataional Organization, 46 (1), 1 - 35. https://doi.org/https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/intorg/v46y1992i01p1 - 35_00.html | |
| dc.relation.references | Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, M. d. (2014). Metodología de la Investigación. México: McGraw - Hill/Interamericana Editores, S.A. de C.V. | |
| dc.relation.references | HM Treasury. (2012). Open Data White Paper. Unleashing the Potential. TSO. https://doi.org/https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a78a13b40f0b63247698e94/CM835 3_acc.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Perl, A. (2019). Studying Public Policy. Oxford University Press. | |
| dc.relation.references | Human Rights Watch. (2023). World Report 2023: Guatemala . https://www.hrw.org | |
| dc.relation.references | Human Rights Watch. (2024). World Report 2024: Guatemala . World Report 2024: Guatemala | |
| dc.relation.references | Instituto Centroamericano de Estudios Fiscales - ICEFI - . (2024). Estudio y recomendaciones sobre avances en fortalecimiento de la transparencia fiscal y datos abiertos, con base en los estándares internacionales. https://www.icefi.org/sites/default/files/volumen_5_digital_ - _estudio_avances_en_fortalecimiento_de_la_transparencia_fiscal_y_datos_abiertos.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Instituto Centroamericano de Estudios Fiscales - ICEFI - . (2024). Estudio y recomendaciones sobre avances en fortalecimiento de la transparencia fiscal y datos abiertos, con base en los estándares internacionales. https://www.icefi.org/sites/default/files/volumen_5_digital_ - _estudio_avances_en_fortalecimiento_de_la_transparencia_fiscal_y_datos_abiertos.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Inter - American Dialogue. (2024). Promoting rule of law and good governance in Latin America and the Caribbean . https://thedialogue.org/wp - content/uploads/2024/08/Private - Sector - Brief - EN - 3.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | International Commission of Jurists. (5 de 5 de 2021). El Salvador: summary dismissal of judges is a blow to the Rule of Law . https://www.icj.org/el - salvador - summary - dismissal - of - judges - is - a - blow - to - the - rule - of - law/ | |
| dc.relation.references | International Crisis Group. (2018). Latin American & Caribbean. Report 70: Saving Guatemala’s Fight Against Crime and Impunity. https://www.crisisgroup.org/rpt/latin - america - caribbean/guatemala/070 - saving - guatemalas - fight - against - crime - and - impunity | |
| dc.relation.references | International Crisis Group. (2024). Saving Guatemala´s Fight Against Crime and Impunity. https://doi.org/Saving Guatemalas Fight Against Crime and Impunity | |
| dc.relation.references | Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Beneficios, barreras para la adopción y mitos sobre los datos abiertos y el gobierno abierto. Gestión de sistemas de información, 29 (4), 258 - 268. https://doi.org/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10580530.2012.716740 | |
| dc.relation.references | Jetzek, T., Avital, M., & Bjorn - Andersen, N. (2014). Data - Driven Innovation through Open Government Data. JTAER, 9 (2), 100 - 120. https://doi.org/https://www.mdpi.com/0718 - 1876/9/2/14 | |
| dc.relation.references | Keohane, R. (1984). After Hegemony. Princeton University Press. | |
| dc.relation.references | Kitchin, R. (2014). The data revolution. SAGE. | |
| dc.relation.references | Knock, T. (1992). To end all wars. Princeton University Press. | |
| dc.relation.references | Krasner, S. (1982). Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables. International Organization, 36 (2), 185 - 205. https://doi.org/https://pos - graduacao.uepb.edu.br/ppgri/files/2016/02/Krasner - Structural - Causes - and - Regime - Consequencies - Regime - as - Intervening - Variables.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Lasswell, H. (1951). The policy orientation. Stanford University Press. | |
| dc.relation.references | Law, N., Woo, D., & Wong, G. (2018). A Global Framework of Reference on Digital Literacy Skills for Indicator 4.4.2. UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) . https://doi.org/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326223206_A_Global_Framework_of_Re ference_on_Digital_Literacy_Skills_for_Indicator_442 | |
| dc.relation.references | Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The Science of "Muddling Through". Public Administration Review, 19 (2), 79 - 88. https://doi.org/https://www.jstor.org/stable/973677 | |
| dc.relation.references | Lührmann, A., & Lindberg, S. (2019). A third wave of autocratization is here: what is new about it? Democratization, 26 (3), 1 - 19. https://doi.org/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331456057_A_third_wave_of_autocratiza tion_is_here_what_is_new_about_it | |
| dc.relation.references | México Evalúa. (19 de 5 de 2019). Índice de Transparencia Corporativa . https://mexicoevalua.org/indice - transparencia - corporativa/ | |
| dc.relation.references | Miles, M., Huberman, M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis. A Methods Sourcebook. SAGE. | |
| dc.relation.references | Ministerio de Gobernación. (2018). Política Nacional de Datos Abiertos. MINGOB . https://gae.gob.gt/wp - content/uploads/PoliticaDatosAbiertos.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Misra, A. (2021). Advancing data literacy in the post - pandemic world. PARIS 21. | |
| dc.relation.references | Moncayo, G., Ortíz, L., & Fiafilio, I. (2022). Implementación del Barómetro de Datos Abiertos 2020: desafíos y oportunidades en Chile, Colombia, Ecuador y Perú. Estado & comunes, revista de políticas y problemas públicos, 2 (15), 59 - 76. https://doi.org/https://www.redalyc.org/journal/6842/684272393003/html/ | |
| dc.relation.references | Noble, H., & Smith, J. (2015). Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research . Research made simple, 18 (2), 34 - 35. https://doi.org/https://ebn.bmj.com/content/18/2/34 | |
| dc.relation.references | OECD. (2016). Open Government: The global context and the way forward . https://www.involve.org.uk/resource/open - government - global - context - and - way - forward | |
| dc.relation.references | OECD. (2017). Government at a Glance 2017. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2017/07/government - at - a - glance - 2017_g1g74dbf/gov_glance - 2017 - en.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | OECD. (2020). Open, Useful and Re - usable data (OURdata) Index: 2019. OECD Public Governance Policy Papers No. 1 (1). https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2020/03/open - useful - and - re - usable - data - ourdata - index - 2019_4c070c33/45f6de2d - en.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | OECD. (2023). Digital Government Review of Latin America and the Caribbean . https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/digital - government - review - of - latin - america - and - the - caribbean_29f32e64 - en.html | |
| dc.relation.references | Ongena, G. (2022). Data literacy for improving governmental performance: A competence - based approach and multidimensional operationalization. Digital Business, 3 (1). https://doi.org/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366147728_Data_literacy_for_improving | |
| dc.relation.references | Open Data Charter. (2015). International Open Data Charter . https://opendatacharter.org/wp - content/uploads/2025/09/Carta_Internacional_de_Datos_Abiertos2015.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Open Data Charter. (s.f.). ODC Principles . https://opendatacharter.org/principles/ | |
| dc.relation.references | Open Data Institute. (2021). Open data and data infrastructure report . https://theodi.org/insights/reports/infrastructure - for - common - challenges - report/ | |
| dc.relation.references | Open Data Institute. (2022). Measuring the impact of data institutions. https://theodi.hacdn.io/media/documents/2022_ODI_Measuring - the - impact - of - data - institutions - 1.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Open Data Institute. (2024). Open data policy report . : https://data - ebrgis.opendata.arcgis.com/pages/open - data - policy - report - 2024 | |
| dc.relation.references | Open Data Watch. (2020). Open Data Inventory : Guatemala . https://odin.opendatawatch.com/country - profiles/GTM?year=2024 | |
| dc.relation.references | Open Data Watch. (2022). Open Data Inventory (ODIN) . https://odin.opendatawatch.com/ | |
| dc.relation.references | Open Data Watch. (2025). Open Data Inventory (ODIN) . https://odin.opendatawatch.com/ | |
| dc.relation.references | Open Government Partnership. (2021). Independent Reporting Mechanism 2021 . https://www.opengovpartnership.org/irm - guidance - overview/irm - local - reports/ | |
| dc.relation.references | Open Government Partnership. (2022). Informe anual de OGP 2022. Construyendo juntos el próximo capítulo de la asociación. OGP. https://www.opengovpartnership.org/es/ogp - 2022 - annual - report/ | |
| dc.relation.references | Open Government Partnership. (2023). 2023 - 2024 Annual Report. https://www.opengovpartnership.org/es/ogp - 2023 - annual - report/ | |
| dc.relation.references | Open Government Partnership. (2026). Guatemala. Miembro desde 2011. Plan de acción 6 . https://www.opengovpartnership.org/es/members/guatemala/ | |
| dc.relation.references | Open Government Partnership. (2026). Informe de resultados de Guatemala 2023 - 2025 – Para comentarios del público . https://www.opengovpartnership.org/es/documents/guatemala - results - report - 2023 - 2025 - for - public - comment/ | |
| dc.relation.references | Open Government Partnership. (2026). Término del glosario: Conceptos básicos . https://www.opengovpartnership.org/es/glossary - cat/basics/ | |
| dc.relation.references | Open Knowledge . (2005). What is open? https://okfn.org/en/library/what - is - open/ | |
| dc.relation.references | Open Knowledge. (2020). Manual de datos abiertos . https://opendatahandbook.org/ | |
| dc.relation.references | Open Knowledge Foundation. (2015). Global open data index . https://index.okfn.org | |
| dc.relation.references | Ramírez - Alujas, Á. (2011). Gobierno abierto y modernización de la gestión Pública. Tendencias actuales y el (inevitable) camino. Revista Enfoques: Ciencia Política y Administración Pública, 9 (15), 99 - 125. https://doi.org/https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/960/96021303006.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Recalde - Gracey, A., Chiquisapon - Salas, O., & Rodríguez - Briceño, J. (2025). Gobierno abierto y participación ciudadana en Latinoamérica: revisión sistemática. Iustitia Socialis , 10 (8), 98 - 109. https://doi.org/https://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?pid=S2542 - 33712025000100098&script=sci_arttext | |
| dc.relation.references | Red Ciudadana. (2021). Índice de Datos Abiertos 2021 Guatemala. https://publicaciones.redciudadana.org/2021/%C3%8Dndice%20De%20Datos%20Abiertos%2020 21.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Red Ciudadana. (2024). Índice de Gobierno Digital 2024. https://publicaciones.redciudadana.org/2024/Indice_de_Gobierno_Digital_2024.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Red Ciudadana y Ministerio de Gobernación. (2023). Índice de Datos Abiertos. https://gae.gob.gt/wp - content/uploads/2023/08/Publicacion_ - Indice - de - Datos - Abiertos - 2023 - Guatemala - MINGOB .pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Restrepo, D., Quion, J., Vásquez - Venegas, C., Villanueva, C., Celi, L., & Nakayama, F. (2023). A scoping review of the landscape of health - related open datasets in Latin America. Plos Digital Health, 2 (10), 1 - 17. https://doi.org/https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000368 | |
| dc.relation.references | Rhodes, R. (1997). Understanding governance. Open University Press. | |
| dc.relation.references | Ross, E. (2 de 12 de 2015). Por qué los datos abiertos no significan gobierno abierto . https://www.theguardian.com/media - network/2015/dec/02/china - russia - open - data - open - government | |
| dc.relation.references | Sabatier, P., & Jenkins - Smith, H. (1993). Policy change and learning. Wetview Press. | |
| dc.relation.references | Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE. | |
| dc.relation.references | Scassa, T. D. (2017). Open government and open data. Canadian Journal of Law and Technology . | |
| dc.relation.references | Secretaría de Planificación y Programación de la Presidencia. (2020). Plan Estratégico Institucional SEGEPLAN 2021 - 2025. Segeplan. https://portal.segeplan.gob.gt/segeplan/wp - content/uploads/2023/09/PEI - 2021 - 2025 - 16_08_2023 - 2 - 2.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Secretaría de Planificación y Programación de la Presidencia. (2022). Guía general para la planificación del desarrollo en Guatemala. Segeplan. https://portal.segeplan.gob.gt/segeplan/wp - content/uploads/2022/08/Guia - General - de - Planificacio%CC%81n - del - Desarrollo.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2002). Basics of qualitative research. SAGE. | |
| dc.relation.references | Ubaldi, B. (2013). Datos abiertos del gobierno: Hacia un análisis empírico de las iniciativas de datos abiertos del gobierno. Documentos de trabajo de la OCDE sobre gobernanza pública (22). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/5k46bj4f03s7 - en | |
| dc.relation.references | UK Cabinet Office. (2010). Transparency data Cabinet Office procurement transparency documents . https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/cabinet - office - procurement - transparency - documents | |
| dc.relation.references | UK Government. (s.f.). Contracts Finder . https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Search | |
| dc.relation.references | UK Government. (s.f.). Data directory . https://www. data.gov .uk/ | |
| dc.relation.references | UK Government. (s.f.). Find a Tender Service . https://www.find - tender.service.gov.uk | |
| dc.relation.references | Umaña, J. (2021). El estado de los datos abiertos en América Latina y el Caribe . https://doi.org/https://cepei.org/documents/datos - abiertos - latam - caribe/ | |
| dc.relation.references | UNESCO. (2023). Guidelines for the Governance of Digital P | |
| dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.rights.coar | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |
| dc.rights.license | Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) | |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject.armarc | Política pública | |
| dc.subject.armarc | Democratización | |
| dc.subject.armarc | Análisis de sistemas | |
| dc.subject.armarc | Ingeniería de software | |
| dc.subject.armarc | Desarrollo sostenible | |
| dc.subject.armarc | Acceso a la información | |
| dc.subject.armarc | Derecho a la información | |
| dc.subject.armarc | Análisis de la información | |
| dc.subject.armarc | Linked data -- Guatemala | |
| dc.subject.armarc | Data protection -- Guatemala | |
| dc.subject.armarc | Información pública (Derecho) | |
| dc.subject.armarc | Administración pública - Aspectos sociales | |
| dc.subject.ddc | 350 - Administración pública y ciencia militar::352 - Consideraciones generales y administración pública | |
| dc.subject.ocde | 5. Ciencias Sociales | |
| dc.subject.ods | ODS 16: Paz, justicia e instituciones sólidas. Promover sociedades pacíficas e inclusivas para el desarrollo sostenible, facilitar el acceso a la justicia para todos y construir a todos los niveles instituciones eficaces e inclusivas que rindan cuentas | |
| dc.title | Datos abiertos como herramienta de transparencia y participación ciudadana : diagnóstico de la política guatemalteca, retos y recomendaciones (2018 – 2025) | spa |
| dc.title.translated | Open data as a tool for transparency and citizen participation : diagnosis of Guatemalan policy, challenges, and recommendations (2018–2025) | |
| dc.type | Trabajo de grado - Pregrado | |
| dc.type.coar | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f | |
| dc.type.coarversion | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |
| dc.type.content | Text | |
| dc.type.driver | info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis | |
| dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | |
| dc.type.visibility | Public Thesis | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication |
