Publicación: Sistema de retroalimentación sensorial vibrotáctil y neumática no invasiva y accesible para prótesis transradial
| dc.contributor.advisor | Leal, José Andrés | |
| dc.contributor.author | Remis Duarte, Santiago Andrés | |
| dc.contributor.jury | Esquit Hernández, Carlos Alberto | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-06-12T21:47:27Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | |
| dc.description | Formato PDF digital — 54 páginas — incluye gráficos, tablas y referencias bibliográficas | |
| dc.description.abstract | La falta de retroalimentación sensorial en prótesis de miembro superior es una de las principales causas de abandono. Esta limitación impide que los usuarios reciban información sensorial al manipular objetos, lo que genera ineficiencia. Actualmente, los sistemas disponibles son costosos o invasivos. En este proyecto se desarrolló un sistema de retroalimentación sensorial no invasiva y accesible para prótesis transradiales, combinando sensores de fuerza con tecnologías vibrotáctiles y neumática. Se utilizaron sensores de fuerza sobre encajes para dedos impresos en 3D para controlar la intensidad de la retroalimentación. La funcionalidad se evaluó mediante pruebas con objetos, observando una correlación entre la fuerza aplicada, la respuesta sonora y el nivel de vibración. | spa |
| dc.description.abstract | The lack of sensory feedback in upper-limb prostheses is one of the main causes of device abandonment, with 85% of users considering it an important factor. This limitation prevents users from receiving any kind of sensory information when grasping and manipulating objects, which can lead to inefficiencies and errors in prosthesis use. Currently, sensory feedback is not available in commercial devices, and the implantable subdermal systems under development require complex surgical procedures, making them highly costly and invasive. A device capable of providing information about the hardness of an object in an epidermal and low-cost manner could significantly improve users’ quality of life and facilitate the control of a prosthesis. In this project, a non-invasive and accessible sensory feedback system was developed for transradial prostheses, combining force sensors with vibrotactile and pneumatic technologies. Force sensors were placed on 3D-printed finger sockets, allowing control over the intensity of the sensory feedback. The vibrotactile feedback was implemented using vibration motors and a 3D-printed base, while for the pneumatic feedback, the actuator’s performance was simulated. The functionality of the vibrotactile system was evaluated through tests in which a participant grasped various objects, measuring both the sound response and the vibration intensity reported by the subject. A strong correlation was found between force measured and sound response and vibration intensity described by the participant. | eng |
| dc.description.degreelevel | Pregrado | |
| dc.description.degreename | Licenciado en Ingeniería Biomédica | |
| dc.format.extent | 54 p. | |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorio.uvg.edu.gt/handle/123456789/6537 | |
| dc.language.iso | spa | |
| dc.publisher | Universidad del Valle de Guatemala | |
| dc.publisher.branch | Campus Central | |
| dc.publisher.faculty | Facultad de Ingeniería | |
| dc.publisher.place | Guatemala | |
| dc.publisher.program | Licenciatura en Ingeniería Biomédica | |
| dc.relation.references | A. D. Roche et al., Upper limb prostheses: bridging the sensory gap , mar. de 2023. doi : 10.1177/17531934221131756 . | |
| dc.relation.references | E. L. Graczyk, L. Resnik, M. A. Schiefer, M. S. Schmitt y D. J. Tyler, «Home use of a neural-connected sensory prosthesis provides the functional and psychosocial experien- ce of having a hand again,» Scientific Reports , vol. 8, 1 dic. de 2018, issn : 20452322. doi : 10.1038/s41598-018-26952-x . | |
| dc.relation.references | L. Chee, G. Valle, G. Preatoni, C. Basla, M. Marazzi y S. Raspopovic, «Cognitive benefits of using non-invasive compared to implantable neural feedback,» Scientific Reports , vol. 12, 1 dic. de 2022, issn : 20452322. doi : 10.1038/s41592-022-21057-y . | |
| dc.relation.references | V. R. Borkowska, A. McConnell, S. Vijayakumar, A. Stokes y A. D. Roche, «A Haptic Sleeve as a Method of Mechanotactile Feedback Restoration for Myoelectric Hand Prosthesis Users,» Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences , vol. 3, 2022, issn : 26736861. doi : 10.3389/fresc.2022.806479 . | |
| dc.relation.references | A. Talhan, H. Kim y S. Jeon, «Tactile Ring: Multi-Mode Finger-Worn Soft Actuator for Rich Haptic Feedback,» IEEE Access , vol. 8, págs. 957-966, 2020, issn : 21693536. doi : 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2961430 . | |
| dc.relation.references | J. Tchimino, J. L. Dideriksen y S. Dosen, «EMG feedback improves grasping of com- pliant objects using a myoelectric prosthesis,» Journal of NeuroEngineering and Reha- bilitation , vol. 20, 1 dic. de 2023, issn : 17430003. doi : 10.1186/s12984-023-01237-1 . | |
| dc.relation.references | C. Antfolk et al., «Artificial redirection of sensation from prosthetic fingers to the phantom hand map on transradial amputees: Vibrotactile versus mechanotactile sen- sory feedback,» IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering , vol. 21, págs. 112-120, 1 2013, issn : 15344320. doi : 10.1109/TNSRE.2012.2217989 . | |
| dc.relation.references | S. Salminger et al., «Current rates of prosthetic usage in upper-limb amputees–have in- novations had an impact on device acceptance?» Disability and Rehabilitation , vol. 44, págs. 3708-3713, 14 2022, issn : 14645165. doi : 10.1080/09638288.2020.1866684 . | |
| dc.relation.references | E. Zepeda, How Do Prosthetic Arms Work? Feb. de 2024. dirección: https : / / primecareprosthetics.com/blog/what- you- should- know- before- getting- a- prosthetic-arm . | |
| dc.relation.references | IGSS, El IGSS fabrica prótesis y órtesis para pacientes amputados , mar. de 2022. dirección: https://www.igssgt.org/noticias/2022/03/01/el- igss- fabrica- protesis-y-ortesis-para-pacientes-amputados/ . | |
| dc.relation.references | ROMP, «Range of Motion Project Mobility for All 2021 IMPACT REPORT,» inf. téc., 2021. | |
| dc.relation.references | Tekscan, How Does a Force Sensing Resistor (FSR) Work? Dirección: https://www. tekscan.com/blog/flexiforce/how-does-force-sensing-resistor-fsr-work . | |
| dc.relation.references | J. S. Schofield, K. R. Evans, J. S. Hebert, P. D. Marasco y J. P. Carey, «The effect of biomechanical variables on force sensitive resistor error: Implications for calibration and improved accuracy,» Journal of Biomechanics , vol. 49, págs. 786-792, 5 mar. de 2016, issn : 18732380. doi : 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.01.022 . | |
| dc.relation.references | G. S. Lakshimi y R. Hemavathi, «Calibration of Force Sensitive Resistor used in Force Controlled Grippers,» International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology , ago. de 2020, issn : 2278-0181. doi : 10.17577/IJERTV9IS080129 . | |
| dc.relation.references | J. J. Stokosa y B. F. Mandell, Overview of Limb Prosthetics , abr. de 2025. direc- ción: https : / / www . msdmanuals . com / professional / special - subjects / limb - prosthetics/overview-of-limb-prosthetics . | |
| dc.relation.references | P. Geethanjali, Myoelectric control of prosthetic hands: State-of-the-art review , jul. de 2016. doi : 10.2147/MDER.S91102 . | |
| dc.relation.references | A. L. Overmann y J. A. Forsberg, The state of the art of osseointegration for limb prosthesis , feb. de 2020. doi : 10.1007/s13534-019-00133-9 . | |
| dc.relation.references | N. Kang, «State of the art for prosthetic reconstruction of the upper limb,» The Bulletin of the Royal College of Surgeons of England , vol. 106, págs. 462-465, 8 nov. de 2024, issn : 1473-6357. doi : 10.1308/rcsbull.2024.150 . | |
| dc.relation.references | OpenAI, Imagen generada con ChatGPT a partir de una descripción proporcionada por el autor , https : / / chat . openai . com/ , Herramienta de inteligencia artificial generativa., 2025. | |
| dc.relation.references | K. Dmytro, Carbon shell prosthesis , 2025. dirección: https://grabcad.com/library/ carbon-shell-prosthesis-1 . | |
| dc.relation.references | DFROBOT, «RP-C18.3-LT Thin Film Pressure Sensor,» inf. téc., 2025. dirección: https://www.dfrobot.com/product-1841.html?search=SEN0295/5-9-19 . | |
| dc.relation.references | H. E. Wheat, L. M. Salo y A. W. Goodwin, «Human Ability to Scale and Discri- minate Forces Typical of Those Occurring during Grasp and Manipulation,» Jour- nal of Neuroscience , vol. 24, págs. 3394-3401, 13 mar. de 2004, issn : 02706474. doi : 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4822-03.2004 . | |
| dc.relation.references | D. Zolnoun e Y. A. Gandomi, «Biomechanical Model of Human Index Finger During Examination,» The Journal of Science and Medicine , vol. 3, págs. 1-14, 1 feb. de 2021, issn : 2690-2656. doi : 10.37714/josam.v2i4.51 . | |
| dc.relation.references | M. N. Kalff et al., «Impact of Gait-Synchronized Vibrotactile Sensory Feedback on Gait in Lower Limb Amputees,» Applied Sciences (Switzerland) , vol. 14, 23 dic. de 2024, issn : 20763417. doi : 10.3390/app142311247 . | |
| dc.relation.references | I. Electronics, «Force Sensing Resistor Integration Guide and Evaluation Parts Cata- log,» | |
| dc.relation.references | Tekscan, 5 Tips for Successful Force Measurement with FlexiForce . dirección: https: //www.tekscan.com/blog/flexiforce/5-tips-successful-force-measurement- flexiforce%E2%84%A2 . | |
| dc.relation.references | R. Mutlu, D. Singh, C. Tawk y E. Sariyildiz, «A 3D-Printed Soft Haptic Device with Built-in Force Sensing Delivering Bio-Mimicked Feedback,» Biomimetics , vol. 8, 1 mar. de 2023, issn : 23137673. doi : 10.3390/biomimetics8010127 . | |
| dc.relation.references | M. T. Thai et al., «Soft Wearable Haptic Display and Flexible 3D Force Sensor for Teleoperated Surgical Systems,» Advanced Sensor Research , vol. 3, 1 ene. de 2024, issn : 2751-1219. doi : 10.1002/adsr.202300105 . | |
| dc.relation.references | I. E. Acoustics, «Specification nominal, subject to change without notice 1 C-2 Tactor † ,» inf. téc. dirección: www.eaiinfo.com . | |
| dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.rights.coar | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |
| dc.rights.license | Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) | |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject.armarc | Protesis -- Diseño | |
| dc.subject.armarc | Detectors -- Guatemala | |
| dc.subject.armarc | Tactile sensors -- Guatemala | |
| dc.subject.armarc | Biomedical engineering | |
| dc.subject.armarc | Materiales biomedicos -- Diseño | |
| dc.subject.armarc | Prótesis -- Innovaciones tecnológicas | |
| dc.subject.ddc | 610 - Medicina y salud::617 - Cirugía, medicina regional, odontología, oftalmología, otología, audiología | |
| dc.subject.ocde | 2. Ingeniería y Tecnología | |
| dc.subject.ods | ODS 3: Salud y bienestar. Garantizar una vida sana y promover el bienestar de todos a todas las edades | |
| dc.subject.ods | ODS 9: Industria, innovación e infraestructura. Construir infraestructuras resilientes, promover la industrialización inclusiva y sostenible y fomentar la innovación | |
| dc.subject.proposal | Prótesis | spa |
| dc.subject.proposal | Retroalimentación | spa |
| dc.subject.proposal | Sensorial | spa |
| dc.subject.proposal | Vibrotáctil | spa |
| dc.subject.proposal | Neumática | spa |
| dc.title | Sistema de retroalimentación sensorial vibrotáctil y neumática no invasiva y accesible para prótesis transradial | spa |
| dc.title.translated | Non-invasive and accessible vibrotactile and pneumatic sensory feedback system for a transradial prosthesis | |
| dc.type | Trabajo de grado - Pregrado | |
| dc.type.coar | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f | |
| dc.type.coarversion | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |
| dc.type.content | Text | |
| dc.type.driver | info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis | |
| dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | |
| dc.type.visibility | Public Thesis | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication |
